1YQ Biotech Ltd., Taiwan.
2Isuzu Optics Ltd., Taiwan.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: a0968288562@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
In the generic drug formulation development, pilot bioequivalence (BE) study with a small group of subjects is the current practice for oral formulation prediction. However, due to the difficulty in differentiating the variation between subject and drug formulation with the current BE practice,a new instrument called PAMPA Dissolution is proposed to eliminate the subjects variation and to enhance the correlation between in vitro to in vivo absorption in BE study. PAMPA Dissolution simultaneously measures drug dissolution (Cb) and permeation (Pe), following the validated oral drug absorption equation F (drug absorbed) = Cb*Pe*Area. The use of biorelevant media further allows this device to mimic in vivo conditions closely. Formulations of 60 mg etoricoxib tablets were studied to verify system reproducibility and BE prediction to demonstrate the potential of PAMPA Dissolution in generic drug development. The BE predictions between generic and brand etoricoxib tablets (test/reference) from this system produced a Cmax value of 99.0% and AUC value of 99.1%, indicating that PAMPA Dissolution predictions conform with bioequivalence results. Other oral formulations of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, ezetimibe, telmisartan, and amlodipine were also tested for their permeation (Pe) by PAMPA Dissolution. Results of drug permeation compared to the literature values indicates that the PAMPA Dissolution is reliable and precise in formulation development.
KEYWORDS: Area Under Curve, in vitro to in vivo correlation, Maximum plasma concentration, Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay,bioequivalence.
INTRODUCTION:
Bioequivalence (BE) is a crucial parameter of generic drug development. Traditionally, dissolution experiments are used to examine the performance of drug formulations following FDA (U.S Food and Drug Administration) guidance, and finally the pilot bio studies were conducted to verify generic formulations.
However, traditional pilot BE study has the following deficiencies: Firstly, small group of human subjects absorption variations makes it difficult to meet BE limits. There is no definite way to differentiate variation between subject and formulation from current pilot bio study. Another issue is that buffer solutions used in dissolution tests as required per the (FDA) regulation, which often falls short in mimicking conditions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract such as the various enzymes from bile and pancreatic secretions, result in poor correlation between in vitro to in vivo correlation (IVIVC)1. This is especially true with BCS II drugs that have low aqueous solubility since solubility and permeability often influence one another9.
Figure 1: PAMPA Dissolution apparatus
To improve oral drug development, a better IVIVC techniques2 is needed. A popular method involves the use of Caco-2 cells, however, Caco-2 cells have to be incubated for up to twenty to thirty days before testing; it is not a time-effective method. An alternative that can be used to improve IVIVC for BE prediction is Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay (PAMPA), which uses a chemically-based membrane instead of live cells and has been proven to be able to accurately mimic the human small intestine3,6,7,8. PAMPA Dissolution system (Figure 1) is a newly designed instrument that combines dissolution and permeation in a way closely mimic in vivo conditions of human gastro-intestinal tract (GIT). It also measures the two necessary parameters: dissolution (Cb) and permeation (Pe) following oral drug absorption by the previous validated equation F (drug absorbed) = Cb*Pe*Area2,3. This PAMPA Dissolution system also produces real-time graphs for dissolution and permeation simultaneously. From these graphs, Area Under Curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values can be calculated to predict bioequivalence. Instead of traditional buffer solutions, PAMPA Dissolution uses biorelevant media, gastric (FaSSGF) and intestinal (FaSSIF) fluids with the respective pH values4,5, further giving it more potential to mimic IVIVC and lead to better BE prediction10, 11,12.
In this study, etoricoxib, a poorly water soluble drug used to treat osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, was selected to validate PAMPA Dissolution as a feasible way to predict BE study. In addition, five other drug formulations were also studied for their permeation as a proof that the PAMPA Dissolution system is feasible in bioequivalence prediction.
Generic etoricoxib (Etor) and brand (Arcoxia) 60mg tablets were purchased from a local market. Reagents including NaH2PO4·2H2O, NaOH, NaCl, HCl, DMSO, phospholipids and n-dodecane were purchased from First Chemicals (Taiwan). FaSSIF/FeSSIF/FaSSGF powder was purchased from Biorelevant (London, UK). Other oral formulations of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, ezetimibe, telmisartan, and amlodipine tablets were purchased from a local market.
PAMPA Dissolution (YQ Biotech Co.) was used to study Arcoxia tablets and generic etoricoxib tablets. The dissolution consists of six standard vessels of USP 2 apparatus (TDTF, China). Fiber optic UV probes at 285 nm are inserted to record concentrations of etoricoxib in real-time13,14,15. On the PAMPA side of the apparatus, Vessels have inner compartments filled with buffer solution at pH=6.5 (with 2% DMSO) and divided from the outer compartments by a 0.45um hydrophobic permeation membrane impregnated with 160μL of 3.3% (w/v) phospholipids solution in n-dodecane.
Vessels on the dissolution side are each filled with 400 mL of pH 1.6 fasted state simulated gastric fluid (FaSSGF) made with FaSSIF/FeSSIF/FaSSGF powder16, 17,18, NaCl, and water. After 30 minutes, 100mL of pH 7.5 concentrated fluid consisting of FaSSIF/ FeSSIF/ FaSSGF powder, NaH2PO4·2H2O, and NaOH is added in each vessel to turn the original fluid into fasted state simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF) of pH 6.5. Stirring on the dissolution side is set to 50rpm; while the PAMPA magnetic stirrer is set to 200rpm to minimize the unstirred water layer in order to mimic actual intestinal conditions as closely as possible. Experimental data were automatically collected and calculated against freshly prepared calibration curves of UV probes at 285nm.
Table 1: PAMPA Dissolution of Arcoxia 60 mg tablets - dissolution data
|
Time (min) |
CH1 |
CH2 |
CH3 |
Red line: Arcoxia-60mg (average of 1-3) |
Time (min) |
CH4 |
CH5 |
CH6 |
Blue Line: Arcoxia-60mg (average of 4-6) |
Average of 6 channels (mg) |
Red and Blue line-- %RSD |
%RSD of 6 Channels |
|
11.14 |
44.47 |
40.29 |
41.09 |
41.95 |
11.28 |
44.17 |
52.05 |
40.83 |
45.69 |
43.82 |
1.80 |
10.06 |
|
22.39 |
52.89 |
51.99 |
48.60 |
51.16 |
22.53 |
50.09 |
54.49 |
41.98 |
48.86 |
50.01 |
12.98 |
8.89 |
|
33.64 |
51.19 |
54.89 |
18.19 |
41.42 |
33.78 |
51.97 |
56.14 |
38.62 |
48.91 |
45.17 |
4.38 |
32.36 |
|
44.89 |
72.53 |
71.82 |
68.77 |
71.04 |
45.03 |
72.23 |
76.07 |
45.29 |
64.53 |
67.78 |
26.87 |
16.62 |
|
56.16 |
64.84 |
62.81 |
62.43 |
63.36 |
56.30 |
61.76 |
64.48 |
35.60 |
53.94 |
58.65 |
33.47 |
19.37 |
|
67.42 |
60.93 |
61.69 |
60.29 |
60.97 |
67.57 |
61.83 |
62.87 |
52.14 |
58.95 |
59.96 |
10.41 |
6.55 |
|
78.69 |
61.38 |
62.08 |
60.57 |
61.34 |
78.84 |
62.20 |
62.53 |
52.00 |
58.91 |
60.12 |
10.98 |
6.72 |
|
89.96 |
61.75 |
62.30 |
61.17 |
61.74 |
90.11 |
62.65 |
63.40 |
53.11 |
59.72 |
60.73 |
10.05 |
6.27 |
Table 2: PAMPA Dissolution of Arcoxia 60 mg tablets - permeation data
|
Time (min) |
CH7 |
CH8 |
CH9 |
Red Line: Arcoxia-60mg (average of CH 7-9) |
|
18.82575 |
-0.00168 |
0.00175 |
0.00441 |
0.00150 |
|
30.07617 |
0.00007 |
0.00337 |
0.01131 |
0.00492 |
|
41.32630 |
0.00193 |
0.00295 |
0.00946 |
0.00478 |
|
52.57693 |
0.02891 |
0.03225 |
0.03820 |
0.03312 |
|
63.84343 |
0.08956 |
0.09184 |
0.09766 |
0.09302 |
|
75.11035 |
0.15179 |
0.15220 |
0.15794 |
0.15398 |
|
86.37648 |
0.21363 |
0.21145 |
0.21954 |
0.21487 |
|
97.64412 |
0.27173 |
0.26883 |
0.27890 |
0.27315 |
|
108.91132 |
0.32936 |
0.32665 |
0.33634 |
0.33078 |
|
120.17825 |
0.38711 |
0.38107 |
0.39275 |
0.38697 |
|
131.44532 |
0.44028 |
0.43463 |
0.44735 |
0.44075 |
|
142.71147 |
0.49447 |
0.48568 |
0.50147 |
0.49387 |
|
153.97907 |
0.54579 |
0.53603 |
0.55354 |
0.54512 |
|
165.24557 |
0.59654 |
0.58479 |
0.60401 |
0.59511 |
|
176.51238 |
0.64682 |
0.63069 |
0.65487 |
0.64413 |
|
187.77942 |
0.69464 |
0.67415 |
0.70044 |
0.68974 |
|
199.04632 |
0.73942 |
0.71576 |
0.74523 |
0.73347 |
Table 2: Cont…..
|
Time(min) |
CH10 |
CH11 |
CH12 |
Blue Line: Arcoxia-60mg (average of CH 10-12) |
Average of 6 Channels (mg) |
Red and Blue line %RSD |
%RSD of 6 Channels |
|
18.99605 |
-0.00496 |
0.00745 |
0.03912 |
0.01387 |
0.00768 |
113.87 |
208.43 |
|
30.24698 |
-0.00238 |
0.00553 |
0.04211 |
0.01509 |
0.01000 |
71.90 |
164.20 |
|
41.49782 |
-0.00453 |
0.01356 |
0.05637 |
0.02180 |
0.01329 |
90.56 |
165.68 |
|
52.74835 |
0.02619 |
0.04488 |
0.14430 |
0.07179 |
0.05246 |
52.13 |
86.73 |
|
64.01550 |
0.09834 |
0.10730 |
0.12877 |
0.11147 |
0.10225 |
12.76 |
14.07 |
|
75.28285 |
0.16476 |
0.17115 |
0.18718 |
0.17436 |
0.16417 |
8.78 |
8.24 |
|
86.54932 |
0.22979 |
0.23416 |
0.25510 |
0.23968 |
0.22728 |
7.72 |
7.16 |
|
97.81708 |
0.29459 |
0.29763 |
0.31405 |
0.30209 |
0.28762 |
7.11 |
6.08 |
|
109.08487 |
0.35627 |
0.35687 |
0.38099 |
0.36471 |
0.34775 |
6.90 |
6.00 |
|
120.35267 |
0.41845 |
0.41202 |
0.43661 |
0.42236 |
0.40467 |
6.18 |
5.27 |
|
131.61973 |
0.48094 |
0.46718 |
0.48969 |
0.47927 |
0.46001 |
5.92 |
4.92 |
|
142.88590 |
0.53659 |
0.52260 |
0.54327 |
0.53415 |
0.51401 |
5.54 |
4.59 |
|
154.15445 |
0.59485 |
0.57380 |
0.59451 |
0.58772 |
0.56642 |
5.32 |
4.44 |
|
165.42080 |
0.64892 |
0.62497 |
0.64407 |
0.63932 |
0.61722 |
5.06 |
4.25 |
|
176.68827 |
0.70076 |
0.67320 |
0.69278 |
0.68891 |
0.66652 |
4.75 |
4.09 |
|
187.95590 |
0.75040 |
0.71948 |
0.74009 |
0.73666 |
0.71320 |
4.65 |
4.05 |
|
199.22290 |
0.79808 |
0.76356 |
0.77674 |
0.77946 |
0.75647 |
4.30 |
3.86 |
Reproducibility of Arcoxia 60 mg tablets:
Figure 2 show the results of PAMPA Dissolution for 60 mg of Arcoxia tablets. The red line represents the average value of three brand data; the blue line also represents the average value of three brand formulation. As seen from Figure 2, the difference between the red and blue lines are minimal. Drug absorption changes after the addition of concentrated FaSSIF solution at 30 minutes, the rate of absorption raised in a faster manner. Furthermore, the amount of etoricoxib absorbed at 120 minutes (Tmax) is around 0.4mg. Dissolution and absorption data specific to individual chambers are shown in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. Table 2 shows that the % RSD of the amount of Arcoxia absorbed is around 6% RSD beyond 90 minutes, which is within an acceptable range of less than 10% RSD. `The minimal difference of about 5% RSD between the red and blue lines for absorption further supports the reliability of PAMPA Dissolution19.
Bioequivalence prediction on Etor 60mg and Arcoxia 60mg tablets:
Since one of the primary purposes of PAMPA Dissolution is to facilitate the drug formulation and particularly on BE prediction, a study was conducted between 60mg tablets of Etor (generic formulation) and 60mg of Arcoxia to demonstrate its prediction in BE study (Figure 3). The results for permeation between Etor and Arcoxia tablets (test/reference) reaches bioequivalence limits of 80.0 to 125.0% with the calculated Cmax value (slope ratio) of 99.0% and AUC value (AUC ratio) of 99.1%, respectively. This system produces a valid results in BE prediction which conform with its marketed status.
Figure 3: Results of PAMPA Dissolution with 60 mg of Arcoxia and 60 mg of Etor tablets
PAMPA Dissolution predictions of five other drugs formulations:
In addition to etoricoxib tablets formulation, five other formulations of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, ezetimibe, telmisartan, and amlodipine tablets were tested by PAMPA Dissolution system. Results are indicated in Table 3. The permeation data were calculated at Tmax and were compared to the literature data20,21,22,23,24,25, which indicates the feasibility of PAMPA Dissolution system in BE prediction.
Table 3: Permeation data from PAMPA Dissolution for six drugs formulations
|
(1) HCT 12.5 mg |
(2) Valsartan 80 mg |
(3) Telmisartan 40 mg |
||||||
|
F(mg) at 200 min |
Cb (mg/ml) |
Area (cm2) |
F(mg) at 200 min |
Cb(mg/ml) |
Area (cm2) |
F (mg) at 120 min |
Cb (mg/ml) |
Area (cm2) |
|
0.003 |
0.025 |
14.522046 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
14.522046 |
0.17 |
0.08 |
14.522046 |
|
Pe (PAMPA) |
Pe (Human) |
Tmax (min) |
Pe (PAMPA) |
Pe (Human) |
Tmax (min) |
Pe (PAMPA) |
Pe (Human) |
Tmax (min) |
|
6.88608E-07 |
4.80E-07 |
200 |
5.7384E-06 |
6.60E-06 |
200 |
2.03235E-05 |
2.70E-05 |
120 |
|
Ref: Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 638 |
Ref:Mol. Pharmaceutics 2021, 18, 2947−2958 |
Ref:J of Pharmaco. and Exp. Therap. 2014 |
||||||
|
(4)Ezetimibe 10 mg |
(5) Etoricoxib 60 mg |
(6) Amlodipine 10 mg |
||||||
|
F (mg) at 120 min |
Cb (mg/ml) |
Area (cm2) |
F (mg) at 120 min |
Cb (mg/ml) |
Area (cm2) |
F (mg) at 255 min |
Cb (mg/ml) |
Area (cm2) |
|
0.04 |
0.02 |
14.522046 |
0.37 |
0.12 |
14.522046 |
0.035 |
0.02 |
14.522046 |
|
Pe (PAMPA) |
Pe (Human |
Tmax (min) |
Pe (PAMPA) |
Pe (Human) |
Tmax (min) |
Pe (PAMPA) |
Pe (Human) |
Tmax (min) |
|
1.14768E-05 |
4.80E-05 |
200 |
2.9489E-05 |
5.23E-05 |
120 |
7.87624E-06 |
7.60E-06 |
255 |
|
Ref:Colloidal and Surface B: Biointerfaces 100, 50-61 |
Ref:AAPS PharmSciTech, Vol. 16, No. 1 |
Ref:Asian J Pharm Clin Res Vol 11,6, 204 |
||||||
This work is supported by YQ Biotech Ltd., Taiwan and Isuzu Optics Ltd., Taiwan.
Conflicts of Interest:
All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
1. Roudier B, Davit BM, Beyssac E, Cardot JM. In vitro- in vivo correlation's dissolution limits setting. Pharm Res. 2014; 31(9): 2529-38. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1349-8. Epub 2014 Mar 28. PMID: 24676770.
2. Sinko, Patrick and Leesman, Glen and Amidon, Gordon. (1991). Predicting Fraction Dose Absorbed in Humans Using a Macroscopic Mass Balance Approach. Pharmaceutical Research. 8. 10.1023/A:1015892621261.
3. Sugano K, Hamada H, Machida M, Ushio H, Saitoh K, Terada K. Optimized conditions of bio-mimetic artificial membrane permeation assay. Int J Pharm. 2001;228(1-2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00845-6. PMID: 11576780.
4. Jantratid E, Janssen N, Reppas C, Dressman JB. Dissolution media simulating conditions in the proximal human gastrointestinal tract: an update. Pharm Res. 2008;25(7):1663-76. doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9569-4. Epub 2008 Apr 11. PMID: 18404251.
5. Mann J, Dressman J, Rosenblatt K, Ashworth L, Muenster U, Frank K, Hutchins P, Williams J, Klumpp L, Wielockx K, Berben P, Augustijns P, Holm R, Hofmann M, Patel S, Beato S, Ojala K, Tomaszewska I, Bruel JL, Butler J. Validation of Dissolution Testing with Biorelevant Media: An OrBiTo Study. Mol Pharm. 2017;14(12):4192-4201. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00198. Epub 2017 Aug 23. PMID: 28737403.
6. Nielsen PE, Avdeef A. PAMPA--a drug absorption in vitro model 8. Apparent filter porosity and the unstirred water layer. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;22(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2004.02.003. PMID: 15113581.
7. Avdeef A, Artursson P, Neuhoff S, Lazorova L, Grĺsjö J, Tavelin S. Caco-2 permeability of weakly basic drugs predicted with the double-sink PAMPA pKa(flux) method. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2005;24(4):333-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2004.11.011. Epub 2005 Jan 20. PMID: 15734300.
8. Bermejo M, Avdeef A, Ruiz A, Nalda R, Ruell JA, Tsinman O, González I, Fernández C, Sánchez G, Garrigues TM, Merino V. PAMPA--a drug absorption in vitro model 7. Comparing rat in situ, Caco-2, and PAMPA permeability of fluoroquinolones. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;21(4):429-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2003.10.009. PMID: 14998573.
9. Dahan A, Miller JM. The solubility-permeability interplay and its implications in formulation design and development for poorly soluble drugs. AAPS J. 2012; 14(2):244-51.
10. Sirisha. S. A Review on IVIVC in The Development of Oral Drug Formulation: Data Obtained from Past Two Decades. Res. J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2020; 12(3):198-204. doi: 10.5958/0975-4377.2020.00034.8
11. Amitava Ghosh, Udaya Kumar Nayak, Prasant Rout, Tanusree Nag, Partha Roy. Preparation, Evaluation and in vitro- in vivo Correlation (IVIVC) study of Lamivudine Loaded Microspheres. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2008; 1(4): 353-356.
12. AV Bhosale, SR Hardikar, Naresh Patil, Rajesh Jagtap, Nilesh Jamdade, Bhavin Patel. IVIVC and BCS: A Regulatory Perspective. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2009; 2(1): 72-79.
13. Indrani Bhattacharyya, Subhra Prakash Bhattacharyya, Subrata Sen, Tapas Ku Laha. Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Analysis of Etoricoxib in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Asian J. Research Chem. 2009; 2(3): 297-299.
14. Chaple DR, Bhusari KP. Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Etoricoxib in Pharmaceutical Formulations. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2009; 2 (3): 597-598.
15. Garlapati Manideep, Nazare Lobo John Shane, Girish Pai, Muddukrishna Badamane Sathyanarayana. Development and Validation of A UV Spectroscopic Method to Estimate Etoricoxib in Bulk and Tablet Formulation. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(2):758-760. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00142.7
16. Manju Nagpal, Pankaj Rakha, Surinder Goyal, Gitika Dhingra, Sunil Gupta. Comparison of Biorelevant and Compendial Dissolution Media and Prediction of In-vivo Plasma Profile of BCS Class II Drug. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2010; 2(1):37-40.
17. Gitika Dhingra, Brinda Sreelesh, Manju Nagpal, Pankaj Rakha, B P Nagori. In-Vitro Dissolution Testing of Ibuprofen Using Compendial and Biorelevant Dissolution Media. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2010; 3(3): 931-933.
18. Palani Shanmugasundaram, Kamarapu S. K. RP-HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation and Validation of Amlodipine Besylate and Atenolol in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form in Biorelevant Dissolution Medium (Fassif). Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(10):3379-3385. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00601.1
19. Joe Chou, Roger Lai, Jason Chou, Shelly Fu, and Hsin-ai Tung Enhancing bioequivalence predictions with PAMPA Dissolution using formulations of telmisartan. Research J.of Pharma Dosage Forms and Tech. 2023; 15( 2).
20. Liliya L. Quantitative determination of amlodipine from Caco2 cell monolayers by high-performance liquid chromatography –mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Asian J. Pharm and clin Research. 2018; 11 (6).
21. Amitava M, Filippos K, and Peter D, Application of Absorption Modeling to Predict Bioequivalence Outcome of Two Batches of Etoricoxib Tablets. AAPS J. 2015; 16(1).
22. Shantanu B, Katare O.P., Bhupinder S, Optimized self nano-emulsifying systems of ezetimibe with enhanced bioavailability potential using long chain and medium chain triglycerides. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2012; 100: 50–61.
23. Aroha B. S., Ana C. C, Mireia M, and Beatriz C, Validation of an Ex Vivo Permeation Method for the Intestinal Permeability of Different BCS Drugs and Its Correlation with Caco-2 In Vitro Experiments. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 638; doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics11120638.
24. Cristina P, Zoran E, María P, Julia H, and Jose M. L, Nanostructured Valsartan Microparticles with Enhanced Bioavailability Produced by High-Throughput Electrohydrodynamic Room-Temperature Atomization. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2021; 18: 2947−2958.
25. Kakuta H, Kurosaki E, Niimi T, Gato K, Kawasaki Y, Suwa A, Honbou K, Yamaguchi T, Okumura H, Sanagi M, Tomura Y, Orita M, Yonemoto T, Masuzaki H. Distinct properties of telmisartan on agonistic activities for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ among clinically used angiotensin II receptor blockers: drug-target interaction analyses. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014; 349(1): 10-20. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.211722. Epub 2014 Jan 14. PMID: 24424487.
Received on 04.04.2023 Modified on 01.07.2023
Accepted on 09.09.2023 ©AandV Publications All Right Reserved
Res. J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech.2023; 15(4):223-228.